Barents Sea Polar Bears

A History of Hunting

Beginning in about 1870, Norwegian hunters killed or captured approximately 300 bears, mostly on Svalbard, every year for a century. In the 1960s, scientists expressed concern about the impact on polar bear numbers, and in 1973 Norway ceased hunting polar bears after signing the international Agreement on the Conservation of Polar Bears. (The Soviet Union had banned commercial hunting in 1956.)

Given the number of bears killed, it has been estimated that the Barents Sea population numbered about 10,000 bears before hunting began. It is believed that the population rebounded rapidly in the first decade after hunting stopped and subsequently grew more slowly or stabilized.

It is unclear why numbers today are far short of the pre-hunting estimate. One factor may be that hunting figures include bears from other populations that migrated into the Barents Sea. It is also possible that the carrying capacity — the number of animals an ecosystem can support — has decreased, or that recovery is being limited by factors such as pollution or climate change.

Two Types of Bears: Coastal and Pelagic

Barents Sea polar bears are in what is known as the Divergent Ice Ecoregion, where ocean currents continually carry ice offshore as it forms. This movement is especially noticeable in summer. As the weather warms, new ice stops forming and the remaining ice drifts north, leaving a gap of water between land and the polar ice pack.

In response, bears in the Barents Sea adopt two principal strategies to find food. The "coastal" bears stay on and around Svalbard and hunt seals close to shore. These 250 or so bears have among the smallest home ranges of any polar bears — as little as 185 square km. They feed primarily on ringed seals on landfast ice (ice that is “fastened” to the coast) and glacial ice in fjords. Most of their feeding takes place in spring, after ringed seals have pupped and when food is most abundant.

The larger group consists of "pelagic "bears that head out onto the ice pack, traveling out to sea with it and wandering large distances in search of food. They hunt over a wider area (almost 400,000 square km) and for longer periods. This is because food is more dispersed on the sea ice than in coastal areas.

Whether a bear is a coastal or pelagic bear appears to depend on which path its mother took. Cubs born to coastal bears generally also become coastal bears. Indeed, a bear born in north Svalbard tends to remain in north Svalbard, while a bear born in the southern part of the archipelago is more likely to live most of its life there.

Polar bears roam across the circumpolar Arctic, where they rely on sea ice to reach their seal prey. But not all sea ice is equal. Learn about the four sea ice ecoregions, how the quality of sea ice differs across the polar bear’s range, and how we can help ensure the bears’ future by addressing climate change.

Barents Bears and Climate Change

Because polar bears rely on sea ice, they are at risk from a disappearing ice pack due to climate change, and that is of particular concern in the Barents Sea. The annual average temperature in the Barents region climbed by as much as 2.7 degrees Celsius (4.9 degrees Fahrenheit) each decade in the past 20 to 40 years, making it the fastest warming area on Earth. Unsurprisingly, this has impacted sea ice in the region: the landfast ice around Svalbard has declined by 50 percent compared to 1973-2000 and the sea ice season is two months shorter than it was two decades ago.

For coastal bears in the Barents, this means the ice on which they hunt ringed seals is sparser and more fractured, forcing them farther inland to feed on bird eggs or reindeer or requiring them to spend more time in the water, swimming from floe to floe and attempting to leap out of the water and onto ice to grab seals. Although polar bears are highly accomplished swimmers, spending too much time in the water depletes their energy reserves; besides, such hunting techniques are far less reliable than stalking seals on the ice.

Another consequence of decreasing ice is that the ice edge is retreating farther and farther away from the Svalbard coast, and sometimes is not even returning in the fall when pregnant bears need to come ashore to den. That means those bears must either swim long distances to shore, again depleting them of vital fat stores they need when going without food while they give birth and nurse their young, or den elsewhere. There are indications that at least some bears are giving up on even attempting to reach Svalbard and are instead walking long distances over the ice to den on Frans Josef Land.

Coastal and pelagic bears are increasingly becoming completely separated from each other, resulting in less mating between the two groups and causing a 10 percent loss in genetic diversity in Svalbard bears over the last 20 years.

Other Issues Facing Barents Sea Bears

While sea ice decline is the biggest issue facing Barents Sea polar bears, it is not the only one. The bears in this region also carry, on average, higher levels of chemical pollutants than those in Greenland or Arctic Alaska, and pelagic bears in the northeast of the population’s range have the highest levels of all. These contaminants include polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and brominated flame retardants (BFDs) that are carried to the region by winds and currents, accumulating in animals in progressively greater amounts as they travel up the food chain. Among other issues, they can affect the immune systems and thyroid hormones of marine mammals, including polar bears; because they accumulate in fat, they can be released into the organs and blood stream of pregnant and lactating females that are depleting their fat reserves while in their dens. They may also be passed to cubs through the mother’s milk. Bears that are already suffering energetic stress because of climate change are only going to become more vulnerable to such impact

The Future

Despite rapid warming and reductions in sea ice, the polar bear population in the Barents Sea appears to be relatively healthy today — some rare good news. Although data is scarce, particularly on the Russian side, population numbers appear to be stable; and, unlike in western Hudson Bay or the southern Beaufort Sea, scientists have not observed widespread deterioration in body condition in the Barents Sea polar bears or decreased cub survival. This is likely due to the rich, productive waters of the Barents Sea.

However, given the species’ almost complete reliance on sea ice, and the rapidity with which sea ice in the region is disappearing, the picture is highly unlikely to remain so positive. Decreases in genetic diversity are an early sign of a population feeling the stress of climate change. It is entirely possible that changes in Barents Sea polar bears will happen not gradually, but rapidly. It is vital that we urgently and significantly reduce our emissions of greenhouse gasses before summer sea ice in the Barents Sea disappears completely, leaving the area’s polar bears literally adrift.